|
Seeking interns in
new political culture
Livemint, June 30,
2010
In June 2009, when
he was in Washington, D.C. to meet senator John Kerry, the young
parliamentarian Kalikesh Singh Deo made a remarkable
observation. Unlike Deo’s frenetic days in India, split between
legislative work and countless visitors, Kerry’s schedule was
marked by unusual calm.
Just before a
meeting, a young girl would quietly step in, brief Kerry on the
agenda, and retreat until it was time for another brainstorm.
“It was so swift,” Deo, member of Parliament from Bolangir,
Orissa, marvels. “There were no conflicting voices, no chaos,
which is why I think he was able to hold seven or eight crucial
meetings in a day. Is it possible here?”
When Deo returned,
the image of the senator’s assistant stayed with him. As he
later realized, she wore a crucial but underplayed designation:
legislative assistant. Her work included monitoring pending
legislation, conducting research, drafting legislation, and
giving advice where needed. “That is when I felt what we as MPs
(member of Parliament) lack: a solid research support staff
to...save time and be more efficient,” Deo recalls.
That realization
prompted Deo to start hiring legislative assistants, thus far
alien to the Indian legislative system, but now starting to
thrive with increasing demand from Indian lawmakers.
While MPs such as
Deo have hired legislative assistants for research, some
research organizations have launched internship programmes to
assist MPs. Buoyed by this new interest, the Constitution Club,
an elite club for MPs, is now considering setting up a bureau of
legislative assistants within its premises.
At the heart of this
trend are two concerns: first, to arrest the declining standards
of parliamentary debate with informed research; and second, to
participate in legislative processes better, as voters make
greater demands on their leaders.
“Perhaps we as a
country are not so insular any more, with globalization in all
spheres,” says M.R. Madhavan, co-founder of PRS Legislative
Research, a New-Delhi based not-for-profit, non-partisan
research initiative. “MPs are travelling all over the world and
getting influenced by best adopted practices there.”
Last August, Deo,
along with Jayant Chaudhary, a Rashtriya Lok Dal MP from Mathura
(Uttar Pradesh), and Anurag Singh Thakur, a Bhartiya Janata
Party MP from Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh, rolled out the
process. “We spread the word through people we knew and got
applications from college students,” Deo says.
dozen interns,
all in their final year of college studies and most from law
schools, worked for the three MPs—and they did more than just
dust files. For Chaudhary, an alumnus of the London School of
Economics (LSE), the work included research into issues in
agriculture, finance and energy.
One of the first
legislative assistants in India, Gayatri Sahgal, a 23-year-old
political science graduate, assisted then-Telugu Desam Party MP
C. Ramachandraiah. Sahgal remembers that the experience helped
her in two ways. First, she realized that her perception of MPs
as corrupt and non-serious white elephants was flawed; second,
legislators face a serious research deficit.
“I was very
surprised,” Sahgal says. “The MP had varied questions—on the
Indo-US nuclear Bill, India’s energy needs, infrastructure
projects...and on each of the topics, he wanted detailed papers.
He wasn’t easily satisfied. Usually, I would make two drafts.
But it was an exciting time.”
Research staffing
for MPs should, Madhavan notes, be a no-brainer. “In the case of
ministers, they have an entire department dedicated to their
subject, but when it comes to legislators, they don’t have
anybody,” he says. “If you look at their roles—one is to make
laws. How can they do it if they don’t have the time to
understand issues? The second important role...is to oversee the
working of the government and question its programme in
Parliament. How can they ask questions with zero research
back-up?”
The contrast between
India and the US or the UK is stark. In the US, legislators have
multiple assistants with specific areas of expertise. A senator
may have a 60-person staff and an annual budget of $1 million
(Rs4.65 crore).
In the UK,
government and policy organizations hire university students to
help with research. At LSE, which has conducted a parliamentary
internship programme since 1998, coordinator Sharon Bray says
the programme has covered more than 250 MPs over the last
decade. Interns, mostly postgraduate students, work for the
experience pro bono.
Deo’s perks as an
MP, he feels, pale in comparison. Apart from using the
Parliament library, where researchers hand out generic
information on subjects and track newspaper reports, Deo does
his Internet research, although he can’t find enough time for
it.
“One can’t decide
policy on the basis of newspaper reports,” he says.
“Policymaking is more detailed, nuanced...(it) needs critical
assessment. I wish every MP had someone who would cut the
clutter and tell them where they need to focus better.”
To hire staff for
his office, carved out as an anteroom in his whitewashed
bungalow in Delhi’s upscale Meena Bagh, the government pays Deo
Rs14,000 a month. With this money, he already has a
computer-literate assistant who manages his appointments. But
for something as exhaustive as research, Deo says he doesn’t
earn enough to pay for it, which is why the interns under him
only got paid for their travel expenses.
But despite these
scant means, more lawmakers are now seeking out research
support. Despite receiving other material perks, some MPs feel
betrayed by this lack of attention to their fundamental needs,
which make for little news.
At PRS Legislative
Research, requests for research assistance have been pouring in
from MPs on a variety of issues. Independently, PRS conducted
two pilot internship programmes in 2007 and 2008, where a few
MPs were provided research assistants who were paid a monthly
stipend.
But experts say such
processes need to be institutionalized at a broader level in
Parliament and universities. “We call it (the programme) LAMPs
(legislative assistance for members of Parliament),” says C.V.
Madhukar, director of PRS. “In the US, fresh graduates from
Harvard join senators. We need to bring this culture as a
must-have for both students and lawmakers.”
J.P. Agarwal, a
Congress MP from north-east Delhi who has been availing of
legislative assistants since 2008, finds a direct link between
research support and quality of parliamentary debates. Many
decades ago, as a first-time MP in the Lok Sabha, Agarwal was
once shocked to find a fellow MP, years older to him, huddle
beneath a bench to hoot at a rival who was making a speech.
“This was not how it
should be,” Agarwal says. Many MPs, he feels, harbour a fear of
making speeches. “Their aspiration to be active in Parliament
then finds expression in cheap antics in the House, which
wouldn’t happen if they are better prepared with solid research
support.”
On days when
Chaudhary travels to his constituency in Mathura, the
31-year-old Parliament debutant admits to being boggled by the
rapid changes in politics, which make demands on legislators and
leave them little time to deal with legislative process.
“What I see now is a
whole new dimension to politics, with technology coming in,”
Chaudhary says. “Earlier, one meeting in a constituency before
elections would be enough. Now we are in constant campaign mode,
constantly reaching out. In the midst of this, if you are a new
MP, politics is like walking a tightrope.”
The MP has now
launched a programme called Action Mathura to connect with young
voters and pick bright minds from local colleges to assist him.
“I’m trying to
institutionalize (legislative assistantship), but I’m facing
problems,” he says. “Most (students) are too stuck...with their
obsession with medical and engineering careers, and don’t take
this experience seriously. So we are still undermanned,
understaffed. I Google on my own. Yet it’s never too late.”
This news can also be viewed at:
http://www.livemint.com/
|